CITATION — REFERENCE ENTRY

Comment on: Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt When Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Tasks — arXiv

Revision d1bbb9ba-6298-4516-800f-425a635d091a · 5/22/2026, 2:38:50 AM UTC
Key
stankovic-et-al-2025-comment-kosmyna
Authors
Stanković, Miloš; Hirche, Ella; Kollatzsch, Sarah; Doetsch, Julia Nadine
Issued
2025-12
Type
article
Container
arXiv
Raw CSL JSON
{
  "DOI": "10.48550/arXiv.2601.00856",
  "URL": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00856",
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Comment on: Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt When Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Tasks",
  "author": [
    {
      "given": "Miloš",
      "family": "Stanković"
    },
    {
      "given": "Ella",
      "family": "Hirche"
    },
    {
      "given": "Sarah",
      "family": "Kollatzsch"
    },
    {
      "given": "Julia Nadine",
      "family": "Doetsch"
    }
  ],
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
      [
        2025,
        12
      ]
    ]
  },
  "number": "2601.00856",
  "container-title": "arXiv"
}

Claims

  1. The commentary raises five primary concerns about Kosmyna et al. 2025: limited sample size and study-design considerations, reproducibility of the analyses, methodological issues in the EEG analysis, inconsistencies in the reporting of results, and limited transparency in study procedures, recommending more conservative interpretation pending peer review.
    "Our primary concerns focus on: (i) study design considerations, including the limited sample size; (ii) the reproducibility of the analyses; (iii) methodological issues related to the EEG analysis; (iv) inconsistencies in the reporting of results; and (v) limited transparency in several aspects of the study's procedures and findings."
    Quote language: en
Available in