CITATION — REFERENCE ENTRY

study-design · shaw-nave-2026-tri-system-theory

Revision 1647dca8-1552-4415-9e58-0b98b36a5e13 · 9/25/2026, 5:47:26 PM UTC

Citation: shaw-nave-2026-tri-system-theory
Claim ID: study-design
Assertion: Across three preregistered experiments (N = 1,372; 9,593 trials) using an adapted Cognitive Reflection Test, participants could consult an embedded GPT-4o assistant that was covertly instructed to give either the correct answer or the intuitive wrong answer on each item.
Quote: Across three preregistered experiments using an adapted Cognitive Reflection Test (N = 1,372; 9,593 trials), we randomized AI accuracy via hidden seed prompts. [...] In AI-Assisted conditions, an AI assistant (ChatGPT; GPT‑4o) was embedded in the survey of each trial. [...] the AI assistant randomly returned either the correct deliberative (AI-Accurate) or faulty intuitive answer (AI-Faulty), accompanied by a short explanatory rationale
Quote language: en
Locator: section: Abstract; Common Procedures

Available in