CITATION — REFERENCE ENTRY

prototype-genre · krakauer2018-experimental-bluegrass

Revision fba76f0d-6013-4419-a917-a12623fffdc4 · 11/1/2026, 10:35:52 PM UTC
Claim ID
prototype-genre
Assertion
A classical definition of bluegrass would require an acoustic ensemble of some combination of fiddle, mandolin, guitar, resophonic guitar, bass and Scruggs-style banjo, with two- to four-part harmony singing, semi-improvised instrumental solos and a "boom chick" rhythm. Following Joti Rockwell, Krakauer argues that bluegrass is not such a category but is continually negotiated with reference to prototypical performances. Many canonical recordings fail the checklist; for example, Bill Monroe's best-known "Blue Moon of Kentucky" has no banjo. There is no universal agreement on the prototypical sound, so the term means different things in different times and places.
Quote
Joti Rockwell writes that bluegrass is not a “‘classical’ category” into which music fits by meeting a set of “necessary and sufficient conditions.” Conditions of a typical classical definition would be that bluegrass is music played by an acoustic ensemble with some combination of fiddle, mandolin, guitar, resophonic guitar, bass, and Scruggs-style banjo, with two-to four-part harmony singing, semi-improvisational instrumental solos, and a “boom chick” or “boom chick chick” rhythm. Rejecting such classical definitions, Rockwell argues that bluegrass music is continually negotiated with reference to prototypical performances ... “Is Bill Monroe's best-known recording of ‘Blue Moon of Kentucky’ (1954) bluegrass or not? According to Bangs's one-size-fits-all definition, it's not (no banjo).” ... Rockwell's study helps to explain why the term bluegrass means different things in different times and places: there is no universal agreement on the prototypical bluegrass sound in the world of bluegrass.
Quote language
en
Locator
page: 165-166
Available in