CITATION — REFERENCE ENTRY
prototype-genre · krakauer2018-experimental-bluegrass
- Citation
- krakauer2018-experimental-bluegrass
- Claim ID
- prototype-genre
- Assertion
- A classical definition of bluegrass would require an acoustic ensemble of some combination of fiddle, mandolin, guitar, resophonic guitar, bass and Scruggs-style banjo, with two- to four-part harmony singing, semi-improvised instrumental solos and a "boom chick" rhythm. Following Joti Rockwell, Krakauer argues that bluegrass is not such a category but is continually negotiated with reference to prototypical performances. Many canonical recordings fail the checklist; for example, Bill Monroe's best-known "Blue Moon of Kentucky" has no banjo. There is no universal agreement on the prototypical sound, so the term means different things in different times and places.
- Quote
Joti Rockwell writes that bluegrass is not a “‘classical’ category” into which music fits by meeting a set of “necessary and sufficient conditions.” Conditions of a typical classical definition would be that bluegrass is music played by an acoustic ensemble with some combination of fiddle, mandolin, guitar, resophonic guitar, bass, and Scruggs-style banjo, with two-to four-part harmony singing, semi-improvisational instrumental solos, and a “boom chick” or “boom chick chick” rhythm. Rejecting such classical definitions, Rockwell argues that bluegrass music is continually negotiated with reference to prototypical performances ... “Is Bill Monroe's best-known recording of ‘Blue Moon of Kentucky’ (1954) bluegrass or not? According to Bangs's one-size-fits-all definition, it's not (no banjo).” ... Rockwell's study helps to explain why the term bluegrass means different things in different times and places: there is no universal agreement on the prototypical bluegrass sound in the world of bluegrass.
- Quote language
- en
- Locator
- page: 165-166
Available in